A Complex Measure of Investment and Operating Aid to an Airport and Airlines (Part I)

A Complex Measure of Investment and Operating Aid to an Airport and Airlines (Part I) - Untitled design 8

Introduction

In July 2008, the Commission received complaints alleging that France granted State aid to the operator of La Rochelle airport and certain airlines. Almost four years later, in February 2012, the Commission decided to open the formal investigation procedure. It eventually adopted a decision in July 2022 [Commission decision 2023/1683] which found compatible State aid for the airport, incompatible on State aid for some of the airlines and no State aid for certain activities linked to tasks performed by public authorities.1

La Rochelle airport was classified as a small regional airport [category D]. The airport was owned by the local Chamber of Commerce and Industry which was also the operator. At the time the complaints were lodged with Commission, the airport had scheduled flights only to about ten destinations. The main airlines that operated at the airport were Ryanair, easyJet, and Flybe.

Because this decision is both very long [about 120 pages] and very rich [it examines several different measures], this article is divided into two parts. Part I reviews the assessment of the measures in favour of the airport operator. Part II reviews the assessment of the measures in favour of airlines.

Part I: Measures in favour of the airport

Subsidies for tasks falling under the remit of public authorities

France alleged that part of the subsidies were intended to cover the costs of tasks that fell within the remit of the state such as facilities and devices for screening hold baggage, control of access to restricted areas, screening of persons and cabin baggage and investments to increase fire safety.

The Commission recalled that “(224) according to the 2014 Guidelines, activities such as air traffic control, police, customs, aircraft firefighting, activities necessary to safeguard civil aviation against acts of unlawful interference and the investments relating to the

infrastructure and equipment necessary to perform those activities are considered in general to be of a non-economic nature.”

The Commission also added that “(225) in order not to be classed as State aid, the public funding of such non-economic activities should be strictly limited to compensating the costs to which they give rise and must not lead to undue discrimination between airports. The [2014] Guidelines specify with regard to this second condition that, when it is normal under a given legal order that civil airports have to bear certain costs inherent to their operation, whereas other civil airports do not, the latter might be granted an advantage, regardless of whether or not those costs relate to an activity which in general is considered to be of a non-economic nature.”

The Commission then confirmed in paragraphs 226-229 of the decision that the corresponding activities at La Rochelle airport were not economic in nature and that their public funding did not exceed the costs incurred by the airport operator. This is because under French law, those tasks were entrusted to airport operators but their financing remained the responsibility of the state. They were funded through airport taxes. For this reason, the Commission checked that the revenue from airport taxes allocated to non-economic activities did not exceed their costs.

Use of state resources

The measures in favour of the airport were funded by the local Chamber of Commerce and Industry [CCI]. In France, CCIs carry out tasks reserved for the state. They are also supervised by the state. For theses reasons, the Commission concluded that “(237) chambers of commerce and industry such as the CCI must be regarded as public authorities and all their decisions, just like those of the national government or local and regional authorities, must be regarded as ‘imputable to the State’, within the meaning of the case-law on State aid, with their resources constituting State resources.”

Does an airport provide a service of general economic interest?

France argued that the public funding of La Rochelle airport was compliant with the Altmark conditions and therefore it did not confer an advantage to the operator. The Commission examined first whether an airport could provide services of general economic interest [SGEI]. France claimed that the airport provided an SGEI because it contributed to local economic development.

“(248) The Commission does not share this view. To assess the extent to which the operation of an airport is an SGEI, the need in the general interest met by that activity must be analysed.” “(249) For an activity to be considered as an SGEI, it should exhibit special characteristics as compared with ordinary economic activities. According to the case-law of the Court, an SGEI is a service that exhibits special characteristics as compared with those of other economic activities and undertakings entrusted with SGEI tasks are undertakings entrusted with a ‘particular task’. Generally speaking, the entrustment of a ‘particular public service task’ implies the supply of services which, if it were considering its own commercial

interest, an undertaking would not assume or would not assume to the same extent or under the same conditions.”

“(250) It is not disputed that, by improving a region’s accessibility, particularly when it breaks its isolation, an airport can have positive effects on local economic development. However, the simple fact that the presence and activity of an airport generate direct and indirect jobs and stimulate the activity of local undertakings, in particular in the tourism sector, cannot be regarded as a relevant criterion for establishing the existence of a genuine SGEI.”

“(251) As a result, the contribution of La Rochelle airport to local economic development, [[…]], is not in itself a relevant factor as long as it is considered separately from the contribution of that airport to the region’s accessibility.”

“(252) Moreover, point 72 of the Guidelines provides, ‘As far as airports are concerned, the Commission considers that it is possible for the overall management of an airport, in well-justified cases, to be considered an SGEI. […] the Commission considers that this can only be the case if part of the area potentially served by the airport would, without the airport, be isolated from the rest of the Union to an extent that would prejudice its social and economic development. Such an assessment should take due account of other modes of transport, and in particular of highspeed rail services or maritime links served by ferries’.”

“(254) The Commission had stated that the management of La Rochelle airport ‘also includes activities not directly linked to the airport’s core activities such as the construction, financing, use and renting of land and buildings, both for offices and storage and for the hotels and industrial enterprises located within the airport, as well as shops, restaurants and car parks. Finally, while the French authorities consider that all the airport activities in question constitute public service obligations, there is no provision for separate accounts for the revenue from commercial activities.’ By considering that these activities not directly linked to the airport’s core activities are part of the public service obligations, France has ignored the fact that the activities do not exhibit special characteristics as compared with other economic activities, and that economic operators assume the same services to the same extent or under the same conditions outside the airport as within it. Consequently, by considering that all the activities of the airport constitute public service obligations, France has committed a manifest error of assessment in defining the SGEI.”

The Commission also considered that France had committed a manifest error because it did not impose a public service obligation through an act of entrustment with clearly delineated tasks, [paragraphs 260 & 261], it did not define the parameters of compensation in advance [paragraph 263], compensation was not calculated according to the net extra costs [paragraph 267] and the airport operator was not chosen through a competitive procedure, nor was it shown that it was efficient and adequately equipped [paragraph 271].

Existence of advantage with respect to interest-free loans

The airport had received public funding in the form of loans from the CCI. France argued that there was no risk for the CCI which owned the land and infrastructure because their value exceeded the amount of the loans.

The Commission rejected that argument on the grounds that that could be relevant “(276) only if, by granting these advances to allow the continued operation of La Rochelle airport, the CCI expected the airport to become profitable in the medium to long term, allowing the CCI not only to see these advances repaid, but also to receive a ‘return on its investment’ remunerating the capital committed, through any profits made by the airport.”

But at the time the loans were granted the airport was loss-making. In addition, there was no study indicating that the airport could become profitable. [paragraphs 279 & 280]

Compatibility

Since the Commission found the various measures in favour of the airport to constitute State aid, it proceeded to assess its compatibility with the internal market. The Commission examined both investment aid and operating aid which was allowed, under certain conditions, for small airports. In the end, it concluded that the aid was compliant with the provisions of the 2014 aviation guidelines and therefore it was compatible with the internal market.

Tags

About

Phedon Nicolaides

Dr. Nicolaides was educated in the United States, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. He has a PhD in Economics and a PhD in Law. He is professor at the University of Maastricht and the University of Nicosia. He has published extensively on European integration, competition policy and State aid. He is also on the editorial boards of several journals. Dr. Nicolaides has organised seminars and workshops in many different Member States, and has acted as consultant to several public authorities.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

31. Oct 2023
State Aid Uncovered by Phedon Nicolaides
A Complex Measure of Investment and Operating Aid to an Airport and Airlines (Part II) - Untitled design 9

A Complex Measure of Investment and Operating Aid to an Airport and Airlines (Part II)

Introduction In July 2008, the Commission received complaints alleging that France granted State aid to the operator of La Rochelle airport and certain airlines. Almost four years later, in February 2012, the Commission decided to open the formal investigation procedure. It eventually adopted a decision in July 2022 [Commission decision 2023/1683] which found compatible State aid for the airport, incompatible […]
01. Aug 2023
by Phedon Nicolaides
Profitability as a Criterion of the Compatibility of State Aid with the Internal Market - Untitled design 4

Profitability as a Criterion of the Compatibility of State Aid with the Internal Market

Introduction When the state has a realistic prospect of making profit, its financial transactions with third parties do not constitute State aid. The absence of profit is a strong indicator of the presence of State aid but not necessarily its compatibility with the internal market. For State aid to be compatible with the internal market it must, among other things, […]
18. Apr 2023
State Aid Uncovered by Phedon Nicolaides
Imposition of Public Service Obligations through Extension of a Concession - hhhhhhhh

Imposition of Public Service Obligations through Extension of a Concession

Introduction It has recently been confirmed in the case law that Member States are not obliged to implement a procurement procedure when they grant State aid. This means, of course, that the public funds they provide do confer an advantage on their recipient undertakings. Compliance with public procurement procedures affects the compatibility of the aid with the internal market. Indeed, […]
07. Mar 2023
State Aid Uncovered by Phedon Nicolaides
Tax Advantages and Competitive Bidding - State Aid Uncovered SM posts 9

Tax Advantages and Competitive Bidding

Introduction Award of contracts or sale of state assets through competitive bidding procedures or tenders are presumed to result in a market prices and to confer no advantage to the winner in the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU. However, on 25 January 2023, the General Court ruled, in case T-666/21, Società Navigazione Siciliana v European Commission, that certain tax advantages […]
07. Jun 2022
State Aid Uncovered by Phedon Nicolaides
A Rare Commission Decision on SGEI Interpreting Decision 2012/21 - State Aid Uncovered SM posts 10

A Rare Commission Decision on SGEI Interpreting Decision 2012/21

A non-profit provider of free services which are in competition with similar services on the market is an undertaking. Introduction The decentralisation of State aid policy of the past decade has made it easier for the Member States to achieve their public policy objectives. By using blog exemption regulations and decisions, they can grant State aid faster, without having to […]
25. Jan 2022
State Aid Uncovered by Phedon Nicolaides
Duplication of Infrastructure Does not Promote Regional Development - Social Media posts 6

Duplication of Infrastructure Does not Promote Regional Development

A private investor is not interested in regional development. A private investor recoups its investment in infrastructure from revenue from the operation of that infrastructure. Duplication of infrastructure does not contribute to regional development. Introduction In 2015 the European Commission caused a buzz in the State aid community when it decided that investment aid granted to a small Polish airport […]
27. Jul 2021
State Aid Uncovered by Phedon Nicolaides
A Rare Commission Decision on an SGEI Measure that Could Have Been Exempted from Notification - juliana malta Uy0Bq8vYjk4 unsplash

A Rare Commission Decision on an SGEI Measure that Could Have Been Exempted from Notification

A public service obligation must be imposed by an act of entrustment that describes in detail the terms of the obligation, identifies the undertaking that offers the service and lays down procedures for preventing over-compensation. Introduction The purpose of Commission Decision 2012/21 on services of general economic interest [SGEI] is, like the GBER, to exempt certain aid measures from prior […]
15. Dec 2020
State Aid Uncovered by Phedon Nicolaides
The Law, Economics and Art of Compensation for Public Service Obligations - post sign 1893086 1920 1

The Law, Economics and Art of Compensation for Public Service Obligations

State aid in the form of compensation for public service obligations must exclude any intangible benefits from the obligation, but may include reasonable profit. The Commission guidelines for State aid in agriculture and forestry, the block exemption regulations covering agriculture, forestry, fishery and aquaculture, and the Regulation on de minimis aid for fishery and aquaculture have been prolonged to 31 […]
14. Apr 2020
State Aid Uncovered by Phedon Nicolaides
Errors in State aid Procedures Need not Result in Annulment of a Commission Decision - StateAidHub blogpost15 airport 2

Errors in State aid Procedures Need not Result in Annulment of a Commission Decision

Interested parties have a right to know how the compatibility of aid with the internal market is assessed. Temporary Framework developments As of 13 April 2020, the European Commission had authorised 51 measures adopted by 23 Member States. According to the statement of the Eurozone finance ministers of 9 April 2020, Member States had provided liquidity in the form of […]
29. Jan 2019
State Aid Uncovered by Phedon Nicolaides
Services of General Economic Interest: Proper Definition and Avoidance of Overcompensation - StateAidHub Blogpost4 2019 Lexxion Stateaid SGEI Social Housing

Services of General Economic Interest: Proper Definition and Avoidance of Overcompensation

Member States need to demonstrate that public service obligations imposed on undertakings are necessary and proportional to the need for public service. A change in the funding of public services does not constitute new aid if it does not alter its objectives, the beneficiaries or the amount of aid by more than 20%.   Introduction It is a well-established principle […]