State Aid Law Blog

State Aid Uncovered Blog

In Lexxion’s State Aid Uncovered blog, Prof. Phedon Nicolaides publishes weekly critical analyses of recent State aid judgments and decisions. Each post presents the key points of a court judgment or EU Commission decision, places it in the context of similar case law or practice, assesses the underlying reasoning and highlights any inconsistencies or contradictions.

Guest contributions from other State aid experts will also be published on the blog at irregular intervals to complement the content of the blog posts.

Subscribe now!

- NPV ×

Injection of State Capital that Is Free of State Aid

Introduction Directive 2014/59 on the recovery and resolution of financial institutions and Regulation 806/2014 on establishing the single resolution mechanism stipulate that if state aid is granted to a bank, it is automatically considered to be “failing or likely to fail” and it must be either resolved, if it is a systemic institution, or, otherwise, liquidated. The only exception is […]

Management of Port Infrastructure through a very long Concession Contract: Is the Funding Gap Method Meaningful?

Competitive selection of the operator of an infrastructural facility normally eliminates State aid. However, modifications to the contract after the operator is selected may confer an advantage that constitutes State aid. Public funding that is calculated on the basis of the “funding gap” method ensures that the aid is necessary and proportional. Introduction   Several recent articles in the blog […]

Airport Operators and Budget Airlines [Commission Decision SA.23324: Finavia, Airpro and Ryanair at Tampere-Pirkkala Airport

During the past 18 months or so, the European Commission has launched more than 20 investigations in the funding of regional airports and the arrangements that these airports have concluded with budget airlines such as Ryanair. This posting analyses a very recent Commission decision which found that no State aid was granted to either the airport operator or Ryanair. This […]

The Curious Case of Applying the Market Economy Investor Principle to a Monopoly

On 3 October 2012, the European Commission concluded, in case SA.33988, that OPAP, the Greek operator of games of chance received no state aid because the Market Economy Investor Principle applied.[1] At first glance there is nothing unusual about a finding of no aid. But, as always, the devil is in the detail. OPAP holds the exclusive rights to organise various […]

- NPV ×

Injection of State Capital that Is Free of State Aid

Introduction Directive 2014/59 on the recovery and resolution of financial institutions and Regulation 806/2014 on establishing the single resolution mechanism stipulate that if state aid is granted to a bank, it is automatically considered to be “failing or likely to fail” and it must be either resolved, if it is a systemic institution, or, otherwise, liquidated. The only exception is […]

Management of Port Infrastructure through a very long Concession Contract: Is the Funding Gap Method Meaningful?

Competitive selection of the operator of an infrastructural facility normally eliminates State aid. However, modifications to the contract after the operator is selected may confer an advantage that constitutes State aid. Public funding that is calculated on the basis of the “funding gap” method ensures that the aid is necessary and proportional. Introduction   Several recent articles in the blog […]

Airport Operators and Budget Airlines [Commission Decision SA.23324: Finavia, Airpro and Ryanair at Tampere-Pirkkala Airport

During the past 18 months or so, the European Commission has launched more than 20 investigations in the funding of regional airports and the arrangements that these airports have concluded with budget airlines such as Ryanair. This posting analyses a very recent Commission decision which found that no State aid was granted to either the airport operator or Ryanair. This […]

The Curious Case of Applying the Market Economy Investor Principle to a Monopoly

On 3 October 2012, the European Commission concluded, in case SA.33988, that OPAP, the Greek operator of games of chance received no state aid because the Market Economy Investor Principle applied.[1] At first glance there is nothing unusual about a finding of no aid. But, as always, the devil is in the detail. OPAP holds the exclusive rights to organise various […]

- NPV ×

Injection of State Capital that Is Free of State Aid

Introduction Directive 2014/59 on the recovery and resolution of financial institutions and Regulation 806/2014 on establishing the single resolution mechanism stipulate that if state aid is granted to a bank, it is automatically considered to be “failing or likely to fail” and it must be either resolved, if it is a systemic institution, or, otherwise, liquidated. The only exception is […]

Management of Port Infrastructure through a very long Concession Contract: Is the Funding Gap Method Meaningful?

Competitive selection of the operator of an infrastructural facility normally eliminates State aid. However, modifications to the contract after the operator is selected may confer an advantage that constitutes State aid. Public funding that is calculated on the basis of the “funding gap” method ensures that the aid is necessary and proportional. Introduction   Several recent articles in the blog […]

Airport Operators and Budget Airlines [Commission Decision SA.23324: Finavia, Airpro and Ryanair at Tampere-Pirkkala Airport

During the past 18 months or so, the European Commission has launched more than 20 investigations in the funding of regional airports and the arrangements that these airports have concluded with budget airlines such as Ryanair. This posting analyses a very recent Commission decision which found that no State aid was granted to either the airport operator or Ryanair. This […]

The Curious Case of Applying the Market Economy Investor Principle to a Monopoly

On 3 October 2012, the European Commission concluded, in case SA.33988, that OPAP, the Greek operator of games of chance received no state aid because the Market Economy Investor Principle applied.[1] At first glance there is nothing unusual about a finding of no aid. But, as always, the devil is in the detail. OPAP holds the exclusive rights to organise various […]

Subscribe to our newsletter for updates on legal developments, upcoming conferences, workshops, and publications in your areas of interest.

Newsletter: Subscribe now