Awards by Arbitration Tribunal

Awards by Arbitration Tribunal - State Aid Uncovered photos 9

Introduction

In an unusual judgment, the Court of Justice found on 14 March 2024, in case C-516/22, Commission v UK, that the UK had infringed Article 4(3) TEU, Article 108(3) TFEU, Article 267(1)&(3) TFEU and Article 351(1) TFEU, in conjunction with Article 127(1) of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the UK from the EU because the UK Supreme Court erred in its judgment of 19 February 2020 in a case brought by bothers Ioan Micula and Viorel Micula against Romania. The two brothers demanded compensation for the abolition of the preferential tax treatment they enjoyed before Romania acceded to the EU.1

In order to obtain compensation, the Micula bothers initiated a dispute resolution process under the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States [ICSID]. The arbitration tribunal found in their favour.

However, in March 2015, the Commission ruled in decision 2015/1470 that that preferential tax treatment constituted State aid and that Romania was prohibited from paying any compensation for withheld benefits since that aid was incompatible with the internal market.

The appeal lodged by the Micula brothers was upheld by the General Court in June 2019, in case T-624/15, European Food v Commission. The General Court considered that since the tax privileges had been granted before Romania’s accession, the Commission had no jurisdiction to exercise its State aid powers. In the meantime, the Micula brothers initiated proceedings in the UK to have the arbitral award enforced. In February 2020, the UK Supreme Court ordered enforcement of the arbitral award.

However, the Commission appealed against the judgment of the General Court and in January 2022, in case C-638/19 P, Commission v European Food, the Court of Justice annulled the judgment of the General Court, on the ground that the General Court was wrong to find that the aid had been granted before Romania’s accession to the EU. According to the Court of Justice, the aid was granted on the date the award was decided by the tribunal. The case was referred back to the General Court and it is still pending [T-624/15 RENV].

According to the Withdrawal Agreement, the Court of Justice had jurisdiction to give preliminary rulings on requests by UK courts before the end of the transitional period. Moreover, the Agreement confers the right to the Commission to initiate action against the UK if it considers that the UK failed to fulfil its obligations before the end of the transitional period. The transitional period ended on 31 December 2020.

This article reviews only the part of the judgment that refers to State aid rules.

Article 108(3) TFEU

After the Court held that it had jurisdiction, that the UK Supreme Court should have had doubts as to the conformity of the arbitral award with EU law and that, as a consequence, the UK Supreme Court should have requested guidance from the Court of Justice, the latter turned its attention to the consequences of compliance with State aid rules.

First, it recalled the relevant principles. “(159) Since the application of the rules of EU law on State aid is based on an obligation of sincere cooperation between, on the one hand, the national courts, and, on the other hand, the Commission and the Courts of the European Union, those national courts must refrain from taking decisions which conflict with a decision of the Commission on State aid, even if that decision is provisional.”

“(160) In that context, it should be recalled that Member States are under an obligation, first, to notify to the Commission each measure intended to grant new aid or alter aid for the purposes of Article 107(1) TFEU and, secondly, not to implement such a measure, in accordance with the last sentence of Article 108(3) TFEU, until the Commission has taken a final decision on the measure”.

“(161)) According to the case-law of the Court, an aid measure which is put into effect in infringement of the obligations arising from that provision is unlawful”.

“(162) The prohibition on implementation of planned aid laid down in the last sentence of Article 108(3) TFEU has direct effect and that the immediate enforceability of the prohibition on implementation referred to in that provision extends to all aid which has been implemented without being notified”.

“(163) Consequently, […], it is for the national courts to draw the necessary conclusions with respect to the infringement of Article 108(3) TFEU, in accordance with their national law, with regard to both the validity of the acts giving effect to the aid and the recovery of financial support granted in disregard of that provision”.

“(164) The national courts therefore have jurisdiction to order the recovery of unlawful aid from its recipients”.

“(165) Moreover, where the national courts are seised of a request seeking the payment of aid which is unlawful, they must, in principle, reject that request”.

Then the Court of Justice applied the above principles to the present case.

“(166) In the present case, […], in the final decision, the Commission found that the payment of the compensation granted by the arbitral award of which it had not been notified constituted State aid that was unlawful and incompatible with the internal market. Although that decision was indeed annulled by the judgment of the General Court, the fact remains that an appeal against that judgment was pending before the Court of Justice at the time when the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom delivered the judgment at issue.”

“(167) In addition, […], the judgment of the General Court did not affect the legality of the suspension injunction and of the opening decision, by which the Commission had also found that the payment of the compensation granted by the arbitral award constituted unlawful State aid incompatible with the internal market and had ordered Romania not to implement that award before the adoption of its final decision.”

“(168) It must be held that by ordering the enforcement of the arbitral award, the judgment at issue requires Romania to pay the compensation granted by that arbitral award in breach of the obligation laid down in the last sentence of Article 108(3) TFEU.”

“(169) It follows that Romania is thus faced with conflicting decisions concerning the enforcement of that award. Therefore, far from ensuring compliance with that provision, […], the judgment at issue fails to comply with that provision by ordering another Member State to infringe it.”

In other words, unlawful aid must be stopped not only by the courts of the granting Member State but also by any other court in any other Member State that happens to deal with a case of unlawful aid. Then the Court of Justice made an important clarification.

“(170) It is irrelevant, in that regard, that the last sentence of Article 108(3) TFEU lays down an obligation on ‘the Member State concerned’, namely, in principle, the Member State that pays the aid, in this case Romania.”

“(171) As the Commission rightly submits, the obligation of sincere cooperation enshrined in Article 4(3) TEU, which underpins the application of the rules of EU law on State aid, required the United Kingdom, and, in particular, its national courts, to facilitate Romania’s compliance with its obligations under Article 108(3) TFEU, if that provision is not to be deprived of its effectiveness”.

“(172) That conclusion cannot be invalidated by the fact that the arbitral award has become final either. The rule that the Commission has exclusive competence to assess the compatibility of State aid with the internal market is necessary in the national legal order as a result of the principle of the primacy of EU law. EU law precludes the application of the principle of res judicata from preventing the national courts from drawing all the necessary conclusions with respect to the infringement of Article 108(3) TFEU”.

“(173) Nor is the first paragraph of Article 351 TFEU capable of precluding the application of Article 108(3) TFEU, since, as is apparent from paragraphs 71 to 84 above, that first paragraph of Article 351 TFEU was not applicable to the dispute before the Supreme Court of the United

Kingdom, with the result that the rules of EU law on State aid could not be set aside by virtue of the latter provision.”

Conclusion

There are many pending cases of disputes between investors and Member States. Even if arbitration tribunals decide in favour of investors, such awards cannot be enforced by any court in the EU if they constitute unlawful State aid. The question that immediately arises is whether enforcement of awards by courts outside the EU would have legal validity in the EU.

Tags

About

Phedon Nicolaides

Dr. Nicolaides was educated in the United States, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. He has a PhD in Economics and a PhD in Law. He is professor at the University of Maastricht and the University of Nicosia. He has published extensively on European integration, competition policy and State aid. He is also on the editorial boards of several journals. Dr. Nicolaides has organised seminars and workshops in many different Member States, and has acted as consultant to several public authorities.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

15. Feb 2022
State Aid Uncovered by Phedon Nicolaides
Compensation and State Aid - Social Media posts 3 2

Compensation and State Aid

An event that causes damage for which the state is liable is distinct from the act that confers the right for compensation. Introduction The concept of State aid covers all resources that are controlled by the state, regardless of the reason why such resources may be transferred to or put at the disposal of an undertaking. On 25 January 2022, […]
01. Apr 2020
Guest State Aid Blog by Lexxion Publisher
older woman sitting at the table, writting

Live Webinar: Covid-19 & State Aid Law in the UK Now

Lexxion has created another new live webinar to keep you updated on current developments of Covid-19 and State aid law in the UK after Brexit. Leading State aid experts Jonathan Branton, George Peretz QC and Alexander Rose will work through the current EU State aid rules and answer your questions.   ✓ Join from wherever you are – high-quality content at […]
05. Dec 2019
State Aid Uncovered by Phedon Nicolaides
Will Brexit Usher in Protectionism? - StateAid Blogpost Brexit EU Lexxion

Will Brexit Usher in Protectionism?

The Financial Times reported on Friday, 29 November 2019, that the Conservative party in the UK announced that it would establish a different state aid system to “protect British industry after Brexit”. The Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, was quoted to have said at a press conference on the same date that the new state aid system would make it “faster […]
20. Nov 2018
State Aid Uncovered by Phedon Nicolaides
State Aid Provisions in the Draft Agreement on the Withdrawal of the UK from the EU - StateAid Blogpost Brexit EU Lexxion

State Aid Provisions in the Draft Agreement on the Withdrawal of the UK from the EU

The agreement on the withdrawal of the UK from the EU requires compliance with EU State aid rules.   Introduction   On 14 November 2018, EU and UK negotiators finalised the text of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the UK from the EU.[1] The Agreement has to be ratified by the UK and the other 27 Member States. Given immediate […]
13. Aug 2018
State Aid Uncovered by Phedon Nicolaides
State Aid Control in the UK after its Exit from the European Union - SAH blogpost32 State Aid and Brexit

State Aid Control in the UK after its Exit from the European Union

After its withdrawal from the EU, the UK is likely to maintain a State aid regime that is similar to that of the EU.   Introduction   In seven months’ time, on 29 March 2019, the UK will leave the EU. But its withdrawal from the EU will not bring to an end compliance with EU rules. The UK is […]
02. May 2018
State Aid Uncovered by Phedon Nicolaides
Compensation for Public Service Obligations - 02.05.2018 SA POL UK SGEI

Compensation for Public Service Obligations

Compensation for public service obligations may be fixed at less than the net extra costs of the provider of the public service to induce it to become more efficient.   Introduction   Every three years the UK determines the compensation it provides to the Post Office Limited (POL) for the extra costs of the public services it provides. Commission decision […]
04. Apr 2017
State Aid Uncovered by Phedon Nicolaides
State Aid on the Day after the Exit of the UK from the EU - m 25

State Aid on the Day after the Exit of the UK from the EU

The UK will “take back control” over State aid. With it will come the challenge of following EU law and practice. Introduction Last June I wrote an article on how the withdrawal of the UK from the EU could affect the application of State aid rules in the UK. The article concluded with the following prediction. “The UK will soon […]
27. Jun 2016
State Aid Uncovered by Phedon Nicolaides
Brexit and State Aid: The Day After - StateAid Blogpost Brexit EU Lexxion

Brexit and State Aid: The Day After

The second part of the Lithuanian measure on the LNG terminal was scheduled to be published this week. In view of the referendum in favour of exit of the UK from the EU, the second part of the Lithuanian measure will be published next week. Instead, this week the focus is on the impact of Brexit on State aid. Introduction […]
16. Jan 2015
Guest State Aid Blog by Emma Linklater
Lady Justice

In Brief: Case C-518/13 Eventech and Case T-1/12 France v Commission

A quick look at the two new rulings this week. This post gives a preliminary overview of the two new judgments this week (more in depth posts with analysis will be online soon!): On Wednesday 14th January the CJEU passed its ruling in the hotly awaited Eventech case (Case C-518/13), while a day later the General Court gave its word on […]
26. May 2013
State Aid Uncovered by Phedon Nicolaides
windmills

The Puzzle of Environmental Aid: Why Do Firms Make Environmental Investments?

Introduction Environmental aid is the second largest horizontal category of state aid, after regional aid. It accounts for about 24% of all aid to industry and services. Yet, one often hears from public officials that the current Environmental Aid Guidelines (EAG) do not provide sufficient incentives for environmental protection. The problem is that aid is calculated as a percentage not […]