Are You Joining Us? 24 Oct 2019, Conference in Brussels: Dynamic Competition in Dynamic Markets

CoRe is partnering up with our friends from across the Atlantic – Competition Policy International (CPI) – for the 1-day conference Dynamic Competition in Dynamic Markets: A Path Forward. You can attend for free but you have to register first. The event is on 24 October 2019, at The Hotel in Brussels. Last seats available so be quick – we’re closing registration soon because the conference is going to be packed! Big thanks to the Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA) for sponsoring the event so attendance can be made free of charge.

Check out the programme and stellar line up of speakers:

8:30 – 8:55 am Registration & Breakfast


9:00 – 9:15 am

INTRODUCTORY REMARKS

Marianela LÓPEZ-GALDOS, Global Competition Counsel, CCIA


9:15 – 10:30 am

MERGERS IN THE DIGITAL SPACE: IMPACT ON INNOVATION

Adina CLAICI, Director, Copenhagen Economics; Director, GCLC

Aleksandra BOUTIN, Founding Partner, Positive Competition

Pedro GONZAGA, Competition Expert, Competition Division, OECD

Robert KLOTZ, Partner, Antitrust & Competition, Sheppard Mullin

Moderator: Ben VAN ROMPUY, Assistant Professor of Competition Law, Europa Institute, Leiden Law School


10:30 – 10:45 am Coffee Break


10:45 am – 12:00 pm

BIG DATA: UNDERSTANDING AND ANALYZING ITS COMPETITIVE EFFECTS

Thomas KRAMLER, Head of Unit, e-Commerce & Data Economy, DG Comp, European Commission

Justus HAUCAP, Director, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics

Bill BATCHELOR, Partner, Antitrust/Competition, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom

Alexander ITALIANER, Senior International Policy Advisor, Arnold & Porter

Moderator: Marianela LÓPEZ-GALDOS, Global Competition Counsel, CCIA


12:00 – 1:00 pm

FIRESIDE CHAT WITH…

Jacques STEENBERGEN, President, Belgian Competition Authority

William E. KOVACIC, Director, The GWU Competition Law Center

Moderator: Lewis CROFTS, Editor-In-Chief, Mlex


1:00 – 1:45 pm Lunch


1:45 – 3:00 pm

REGULATION OR COMPETITION IN THE DIGITAL SPACE: WHAT’S BEST FOR CONSUMERS?

Rene AUGUSTINE, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, International and Policy, US DOJ

Jonathan BAKER, Research Professor of Law, Washington College of Law, American University

Georgios MAVROS, Public Policy & Government Relations EMEA, Google

Samuel LAURINKARI, Head of EU Affairs, eBay

Nicholas BANASEVIC, Head of Unit, IT, Internet & Consumer Electronics, DG Comp, European Commission

Moderator: Assimakis KOMNINOS, Partner, White & Case


3:00 – 3:15 pm Coffee Break


3:15 – 4:30 pm

ONGOING CONSULTATIONS

Maria COPPOLA, Counsel for International Antitrust, US FTC

Joaquín LÓPEZ VALLÉS, Director, Department for the Promotion of Competition, CNMC

Henri PIFFAUT, Vice President, French Competition Authority

Will HAYTER, Senior Director for Policy, Advocacy & International, CMA

Moderator: Jacques STEENBERGEN, President, Belgian Competition Authority


4:30 – 5:30 pm Cocktail Reception

Register via Eventbrite: HERE

If you can’t make it to the event (that’s a pity!), the CoRe Blog has you covered – we’ll make a post on the most interesting discussions that emerge from the conference so you don’t miss out.

Tip: While you’re at the event, take the opportunity to meet one of the CoRe Blog editors, Daniel Mandrescu. Or if you’re interested in reading or publishing in the CoRe journal, make sure to have a chat with its managing editors Ben van Rompuy and Robert Klotz.

Tags

About

Lexxion Publisher

Established in 2002, Lexxion offers professional journals, books, and events closely related to legal practice. Lexxion’s products cover topics such as Competition law, State aid law, Public Procurement, Public-Private Partnerships, EU Funds, Food Law, Chemical law and Climate Law at the European level. In 2013 we have launched the State Aid Uncovered blog as a Lexxion imprint, in 2018 the CoRe Blog followed.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

19. Apr 2021
Features by Friso Bostoen
Article 22, Merger Regulation, European Commission, Guidance, killer acquisitions, GAFAM

The Commission’s Article 22 EUMR Guidance: catching killer acquisitions through the merger referral procedure?

Over the past five years, the EU’s merger control regime has been hotly debated. The main concern driving the debate has been the intensive acquisition activity in the tech and pharmaceutical sectors. However, many of those acquisitions escape the jurisdictional thresholds of the EU Merger Regulation (EUMR) and therefore cannot be reviewed by the European Commission (EC). On 26 March […]
23. Mar 2021
Features by Inês F. Neves

A role for competition policy in fighting gender inequality: not a matter of if, but how

Competition policy is normally thought to be fit at promoting and protecting effective competition in markets, this way enhancing efficient outcomes to the benefit of consumers. As a result, while one may point to some indicia on the relevance of other public interests and values (let us consider, for instance, Articles 101(3) and 106 of the Treaty on the Functioning […]
03. Dec 2020
Features by Daniel Mandrescu

Why you (often) don’t need the essential facility doctrine in the digital economy? – Interpreting Lithuanian Railways and Slovak Telekom

The insights from Lithuanian Railways and Slovak Telekom may have serious implications for the application of the Oscar Bronner case law in the future. These insights may prove, however, to have the most value in the digital economy where it would appear that the essential facility doctrine might often not even be needed – not even in the case of […]
05. Nov 2020
Case Digests by Kiran Desai

2019:354 KPN BV v European Commission

Court General Court Date of ruling 23 May 2019 Case name (short version) KPN BV v European Commission Case Citation T-370/17 ECLI:EU:T:2019:354 Key words Competition — Concentrations — Netherlands market for television services and telecommunications services — Full-function joint venture — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement — Commitments — Relevant market — […]
22. Sep 2020
Features by Daniel Mandrescu
Epic, Fortnite, Apple, battle royale, competition law, antitrust, district court, monopolization, monopoly, essential facilities, refusal to supply, tying, abuse of dominance

Epic v Apple (2): market power and foreclosure in the app distribution market(s)

Epic’s battle against Apple has been extensively covered in media in the past month. This attention is undoubtedly due to Epic’s explicit move against Apple’s terms and conditions as well as Apple’s fierce reaction to cut all ties with Epic. Epic’s legal dispute is, however, not only against Apple but also against Google who has removed Epic from its Play […]
16. Jun 2020
Features by Virgilio Mouta Pereira
connections

Hitting the mark or setting the bar too high? The “merger gap” and prospective analysis in the aftermath of CK Hutchison/Telefónica

by Miguel Marques de Carvalho and Virgílio Pereira On 28 may 2020, the General Court (“GC”) handed down a landmark judgment whereby it overturned the European Commission’s (“Commission”) decision which had prohibited the four-to-three acquisition of Telefónica UK (“O2”) by Hutchison 3G UK (“Three”). This blogpost provides an overview  of the main points raised by the ruling and offers some […]
09. Jun 2020
Features by Alice Rinaldi
Mobile apps image

Re-imagining the Abuse of Economic Dependence in a Digital World

As proven by the recent consultation on the Digital Services Act, the European Union is actively pursuing new solutions to cope with the challenges posed by digitalization. This post proposes a new approach to conducts taking place in the context of online commercial relationships, such as refusals to access platforms or datasets. Namely, it suggests that the European legislator should […]
28. May 2020
Features by Marios Iacovides
corona virus

Covid-19 and the transformative power of State Aid: a framework for a democratically legitimate recovery

By Julian Nowag and Marios Iacovides The coronavirus pandemic has led to major shocks to the global economy and the EU Member States, with hardly any State spared. The European Commission estimates that the EU economy will contract by 7.5 % in 2020. Unemployment is forecast to rise from 6.7% in 2019 to 9% in 2020. Within this context, the […]
19. May 2020
Features by Virgilio Pereira
Amazon logo

Amazon/Deliveroo: Dynamic Counterfactual Analysis and the Failing-Firm Defence

The economic and financial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic foreshadows an increase in the number of deals where the so-called “failing-firm defence” (“FFD”) might come under discussion, as recently demonstrated by the provisional clearance of Amazon’s investment in Deliveroo by the Competition and Markets Authority (“CMA”). This blogpost addresses the interplay between the FFD and dynamic counterfactual analysis, in light of the […]
23. Apr 2020
Features by Friso Bostoen

Venture capital and antitrust: on exit strategies, killer acquisitions, and innovation harms

Venture capital (VC) is the primary source of financing for early-stage startups bringing their innovation to market. And a disproportionate amount of venture capital goes to startups in the tech sector. However, the last few years have seen a contraction in VC investment, particularly in potential competitors to incumbent digital platforms such as Facebook, Google and Amazon, which some interpret as […]

If you are interested, please use our Newletter to stay informed about our upcoming conferences, workshops, trainings and current published journals in our core areas of EU competition, data protection, substances and environmental law, as well as exciting new projects in emerging technologies and digitalisation.

Don’t miss any news and sign up for our free news alert.  Sign up now