Being a Competition and State Aid Trainee at the EFTA Surveillance Authority

efta

We are happy to welcome two young professionals on the State Aid Blog today. Guðmundur Guðmundsson and Amie Eliassen are trainees at EFTA Surveillance Authority in the Competition and State Aid Directorate and give their insights on working in this dynamic and multicultural work environment. You want to apply for a traineeship yourself? Read on for more information.

 

The EFTA Surveillance Authority (ESA) ensures that Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein (the “EFTA States”) comply with their obligations under the EEA Agreement, including State aid law. As trainees in ESA’s Competition and State Aid Directorate, we work regularly on State aid and competition cases. The traineeship allows trainees to specialise in State aid and competition law within a dynamic and multicultural work environment. In other words, a unique opportunity for young lawyers and graduates!

This post is a short introduction to the EFTA Surveillance Authority, its organisation and enforcement powers and highlights some recent State aid decisions of the Authority. More information on the traineeship itself and how to apply are detailed below.

1. Competition and State Aid at ESA

ESA is independent of the EFTA States and is based in Brussels. In the same way as the European Commission (the “Commission”) supervises the EU Member States, the Authority supervises the EFTA States, thus protecting the rights of individuals and market participants who find their rights infringed by rules or practices of the EFTA States or companies within those States.

The Authority is led by a College which consists of three members and is served by four departments that form the staff of the Authority: the Internal Market Affairs Directorate, the Competition and State Aid Directorate, the Legal and Executive Affairs Department and the Administration.

The Competition and State Aid Directorate (“CSA”) ensures the enforcement of the competition rules in the EEA Agreement in the EFTA States, and monitors State aid granted by the EFTA States, in the same way as the Commission monitors State aid granted by the Member States. The Authority has wide investigative and enforcement powers in the field of competition and State aid, and may inter alia order the recovery of unlawful State aid from recipients in the EFTA States, and impose fines on undertakings for breach of EEA competition rules.


Do you know we also publish a journal on State aid?

EStAL banner
The European State Aid Law Quarterly is available online and in print, and our subscribers benefit from a reduced price for our events.


 

2. Recent State Aid Cases

2.1 State Aid at the Authority

Control and guidance in the field of State aid is an important task for the Authority. Traditionally, aid has had to be notified to, and approved by, the Authority before it could be granted by an EFTA State. With the reform of the State aid rules in 2014, the General Block Exemption Regulation (“GBER”) was extended significantly, exempting a wide category of aid measures from notification. Norway has made great use of the GBER, exempting 87 measures under the scheme in 2014-2015. Iceland has exempted two schemes, whilst Liechtenstein has yet to make use of the GBER. Monitoring of the GBER has therefore become an important task for the Authority in order to ensure that the EFTA States apply the provisions of the GBER correctly.

State aid that does not fall within the GBER, still requires prior notification to the Authority. Environmental aid in Norway and power contracts in Iceland are among the significant notified cases dealt with by the Authority in 2015. Tax measures, however, comprise more than 60% of all aid in the EFTA States.

 

2.2 Power and Transmissions Contracts in Iceland

In 2015, the Authority dealt with two interesting cases concerning sale of electricity and transmission of power to silicon metal plants, to be constructed in Iceland.[1] In both cases, the undertaking in question signed a power purchase agreement with the national power company as well as a transmission agreement with the operator responsible for transmission of electricity in Iceland.

According to settled case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, whether a State measure constitutes aid depends on whether the recipient undertaking receives an economic advantage which it would not have obtained under normal conditions. In doing so, the Authority has to apply the market economy operator (“MEO”) test, which in essence provides that State aid is granted whenever a State makes funds available to an undertaking which in the normal course of events would not be provided by a private investor applying ordinary commercial criteria and disregarding other considerations of social, political or philanthropic nature.

However, the Icelandic electricity system is isolated and at present there is no interconnection. There have been discussions about an interconnector between Iceland and the United Kingdom but no decision has been taken yet. Therefore, a market price is not readily available, given the peculiarities of the Icelandic electricity market. A large majority of all electricity is sold to a few customers, which all have concluded long-term agreements with the domestic power providers at different points in time. This isolation and the abundant potential to produce electricity in Iceland are assumed to be the main reasons for the differences in the price of electricity in Iceland and elsewhere in the EEA.

Against this background, the Authority based its assessment on indicators other than “pari passu” transactions; an open, transparent, non-discriminatory and unconditional tender procedure; or comparable transactions carried out by comparable private operators in comparable situations.

The Authority reviewed the contracts taking into consideration the economic calculations relied on by the parties to the agreements, economic terms of the agreements and other contractual conditions. The Authority found that in both cases, the power purchase agreements, and the transmission agreements generate an acceptable rate of return and therefore were concluded on market terms and did not entail State aid.

It is safe to say that these two cases follow a trend of State aid cases from Iceland concerning the electricity market. At this point in time, a similar power purchase agreement is currently in a pre-notification phase and the Authority anticipates more notifications in the not-too-distant future.

3. Interested in Becoming a Trainee at the Authority?

Each year six candidates are invited to join the EFTA Surveillance Authority trainee programme for eleven months. The Authority offers two positions in CSA, two positions in IMA, one position in LEA and one position in Press and Information. The traineeship provides young professionals and recent graduates from the EEA EFTA States (Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway) a unique opportunity to experience and participate in the work of the Authority and the inner workings of the EEA Agreement. The Authority offers a competitive monthly allowance, free, furnished and private accommodation in Brussels, private health, life, invalidity and travel insurance and reimbursement of travel costs upon taking up and leaving the traineeship.

The trainees in CSA work closely with the case handlers on State aid and competition issues. The case handlers in CSA have substantial experience in State aid and competition matters, within both the private and public sector in different European jurisdictions. The trainees work as case handlers on individual cases as well as on larger case teams with the other case handlers in CSA. The workload is usually divided equally between competition and State aid; however this depends on the Authority’s current case load. The trainees regularly attend European Competition Network Working Group Meetings as well as other competition and State aid related meetings hosted by the Commission.

The trainees become part of the working environment of CSA, and are included in annual international “package” meetings in Norway and/or Iceland, where the Authority’s main State aid and commission cases are discussed with Norwegian and Icelandic authorities. Every year, the trainees in CSA, IMA and LEA are taken to Luxemburg, and given the chance to witness proceedings of the Authority in front of the EFTA Court.

The deadline for applications for this year’s traineeship is the 6 March 2016. Applications must be submitted on the Authority’s website:

http://www.eftasurv.int/about-the-authority/vacancies/current-vacancies/.

We highly encourage young lawyers who are interested in EEA matters to apply for the traineeship at ESA. It is an opportunity to gain international working experience while exploring the legal framework of the EEA agreement.

—————————————————————————

[1] Decisions Nos: 67/15/COL (United Silicon), 207/15/COL and 206/15/COL (PCC).

Tags

Über

G. Guðmundsson

Zusammenhängende Posts

18. Jul 2023
State Aid Uncovered von Phedon Nicolaides
The Non-economic Nature of a Public Health System and Regional Development - State Aid Uncovered SM posts 44

The Non-economic Nature of a Public Health System and Regional Development

Introduction This article reviews two judgments: On a public health system and on regional development through capital injections. I. Public health system On 27 April 2023, the Court of Justice rendered its judgment in case C-492/21 P, Casa Regina Apostolorum della Pia Società delle Figlie di San Paolo v European Commission.[1] Casa Regina Apostolorum della Pia Società delle Figlie di […]
26. Apr 2022
State Aid Uncovered von Phedon Nicolaides
Member States Must Recover of their Own Initiative Illegally Granted Aid - State Aid Uncovered SM posts 3

Member States Must Recover of their Own Initiative Illegally Granted Aid

Aid granted illegal must be recovered by the granting authority without any need for a prior Commission decision ordering recovery. The amount of recovered aid may be limited to that which is in excess of what is allowed by the GBER. Introduction It is a well-established principle in the case law that a “prudent market operator” is responsible to check […]
20. Jul 2021
State Aid Uncovered von Phedon Nicolaides
The Italian Health System Is not Economic in Nature - 29 camilo jimenez vGu08RYjO s unsplash 1

The Italian Health System Is not Economic in Nature

Certain elements of competition that raise efficiency do not undermine the social solidarity foundations of a health care system. Introduction A question that has been addressed by the Court of Justice but not in sufficient detail is whether the providers of non-economic health services can compete with each other. The answer is conditionally affirmative. Competition that does not undermine the […]
06. Okt 2020
State Aid Uncovered von Phedon Nicolaides
Member States Beware: Compliance with the GBER and the SME Criteria has just Become more Difficult - doors 1767564 1920

Member States Beware: Compliance with the GBER and the SME Criteria has just Become more Difficult

I am grateful to Péter Staviczky for comments on an earlier draft of this article. I am solely responsible for its contents. The European Commission retains its sole right to assess the compatibility of aid granted on the basis of the GBER. Criteria defined in national law need not be taken into account by the Commission. The SME status has […]
14. Jul 2020
State Aid Uncovered von Phedon Nicolaides
report

2019 Competition Report

The Annual Competition Report is a useful document, but it should provide more information on the results of the ex post evaluations and ex post monitoring. Update on Temporary Framework: Number of approved and published COVID-19 measures, as of 10 July 2020: 202* Legal basis: Article 107(2)(b): 20; Article 107(3)(b): 171; Article 107(3)(c): 17 Six Member States have implemented 11 […]
30. Jun 2020
State Aid Uncovered von Phedon Nicolaides
insurance protected

Health Insurance Based on Social Solidarity Is Non-economic

I am grateful to Peter Staviczky for comments on an earlier version of this article. I am, of course, solely responsible for the views expressed here. Public funding of health insurance systems based on social solidarity does not constitute State aid. Limited competition for the purpose of increasing efficiency does not affect the non-economic nature of such systems. Update on […]
11. Jun 2020
Guest State Aid Blog von Erika Szyszczak
When State Aid Gets Political - brexit 3870554 1920

When State Aid Gets Political

We are happy to receive a guest comment on the EU – UK post-Brexit trade negotiations from Professor Emerita, Erika Szyszczak, who is a Fellow of UKTPO at the University of Sussex. This is a longer version of an earlier Blog published on the UKTPO website. Control over State aid is a stumbling block for the future of an EU […]
02. Jun 2020
State Aid Uncovered von Phedon Nicolaides
euro coins

i) Investor-State Arbitration ii) Recovery of Incompatible State Aid iii) State Aid Scoreboard 2019

Member States abolish bilateral investment treaties between themselves. When the Commission orders recovery of incompatible State aid, interest has to be added to the recoverable amount for the whole period of illegality regardless of any national limitation rules. In 2018, Member States granted EUR 121 billion to industry and services, EUR 6.3 billion to agriculture and EUR 50 billion to […]
14. Mai 2020
Guest State Aid Blog von Wout De Cock
corona virus

Belgium and COVID-19: The European Commission Approves Several Belgian State Aid Measures

We are happy to share with you an update on the Covid-19 measures that have been approved in Belgium. Our guest auhor Wout De Cock is a PhD candidate at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel and part-time teaching assistant at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.* Introduction In issue 1/2020 of the European State Aid Law Quarterly, we concluded that the European Commission […]
27. Apr 2020
State Aid Uncovered von Phedon Nicolaides
corona virus poster

Identification of Undertakings in Difficulty

A company is in difficulty if, in practice, its accumulated net losses exceed 50% of its subscribed capital, regardless of whether the subscribed capital is formally written down. The classification of a company as being in difficulty is independent of the sector in which it operates and of whether a private investor would be willing to invest in it. Temporary […]